The student voice of Solano Community College

The cost of feral cats

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

Of the 50 million feral cats in the United States, about two dozen reside at Solano Community College. It’s easy to ignore them, but feral cats are an expensive issue of animal welfare.

According to, a volunteer organization which helps homeless cats in Solano county, in California, more than $50 million a year (coming largely from taxes) is spent by animal control agencies and shelters for cat-related expenses. The national figure is estimated in the hundreds of millions.

Feral cats also reproduce at a rate of 4.9 kittens per female feral cat a year. This rapid birth rate also means that there won’t be enough resources to contain all these feral cats, according to Solano Ferals. The rapid population increase leads to mass euthanasia.

In California alone, 750,000 to one million animals are euthanized for this reason. And, more than 60 percent of the animals impounded in California shelters die there. Euthanasia is also expensive, costing about $100 per animal. This means California alone spends 75-100 million dollars on euthanizing animals, the Solano Ferals website says.

One solution to control the feral cat population is a method known as Trap-Neuter-Return. In the Trap-Neuter-Return program, feral cats are caught, neutered and returned to the wild. This allows the feral cat to live but not reproduce, thus controlling the feral cat population and sparing the animals life. It’s also about $50 cheaper on average than euthanasia and a more humane approach to feral cat overpopulation.

Critics argue that TNR isn’t effective. Take Part, a digital news and lifestyle magazine and social action platform, says you’d need to “neuter 71 to 94 percent”, of feral cats in an area for TNR to be effective, and according to Take Part that has yet to be done by a program. Letting these cats go could also be problematic if they have a disease, allowing them to potentially spread what they have to other cat populations or humans, according to Take Part.

Print Friendly


1 Comment

One Response to “The cost of feral cats”

  1. Clifford Hawley on November 5th, 2015 12:58 pm

    I have a major problem with your article. You say that Take Part says, “you d need to “neuter 71 to 94 percent” , of feral cats in the area of TNR to be effective” but that quote comes to Take Part via Julie Levy who is the author of the peer-reviewed study cited by TNR advocates. The conclusion of that paper that TNR works to reduce feral cat populations is completed undermined by their own paper. They removed 47% of the cats through adoption and euthanized 11%. They removed almost 60% of the cats on their own which meant they only needed a small number to die by coyotes or other “natural means” aka car tires in order to see a population decline. Sloppy reporting to cite Take Part as the source of the information when it actually comes from a peer-reviewed scientific paper. For properly cited work you might want to check out


In the interest of fair play, no personal attacks are permitted in this newspaper's comments. You may question or argue the content, but not attack the commenter. Failure to adhere to these guidelines result in removal and blocked access.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.


The student voice of Solano Community College
The cost of feral cats